PROCEDURAL HISTORY - Grant Krieger
December 11, 2000
Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta
(Acton J.) Section 7(1) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances
Act,inasmuch as it relates to cannabis marihuana, declared inconsistent with
the Charter; declaration suspended for one year; Respondent granted an
exemption from the application of s. 7(1); charge stayed
June 20, 2001
Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta
(Acton J.) Applicant acquitted of possession of a controlled
substance for the purpose of trafficking contrary to s. 5(2) of the Controlled
Drugs and Substances Act
November 28, 2001
Court of Appeal of Alberta
(O'Leary J.A.) Period of judicial stay extended until further
order of the Court of Appeal
December 4, 2002
Court of Appeal of Alberta
(Wittman, Costigan and LoVecchio JJ.A.) Acquittal on s. 5(2) set
aside and new trial ordered; appeal with respect to s. 7(1) dismissed
March 25, 2003
Supreme Court of Canada
(Arbour J.) Motion to extend time allowed
May 20, 2003
Supreme Court of Canada Application for leave to appeal filed
September 29, 2003
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE
SEPTEMBER 29, 2003 / LE 29 SEPTEMBRE 2003
CORAM: Chief Justice McLachlin and Major and
Fish JJ.
La juge en chef McLachlin et les juges Major et Fish
Her Majesty the Queen
v. (29569)
Grant Wayne Krieger (Crim.) (Alta.)
NATURE OF THE CASE
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Criminal law - Cannabis
marihuana - Cultivation and trafficking - Accused cultivating cannabis
marihuana for his own medical needs and supplying others as well - Trial
judge finding that prohibition on production of cannabis marihuana
infringing accused's s. 7 Charter rights and not saved by s. 1 - Whether
the Court of Appeal erred in holding that s. 7 of the Charter guarantees
the right to grow (and by implication, possess) marihuana, to anyone
with a medical need for this drug - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in
holding that, by reason of s. 7 of the Charter, to sustain the validity
of the general prohibition on the production (and by implication,
possession) of marihuana, the government of Canada is obliged to ensure
a legal, safe, and reliable source and supply of this drug for anyone
with a medical need for it - Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, S.C.
1996, c. 19, ss. 5(2), 7(1), 56.
ADDENDUM:
October 26, 2006
Supreme Court of Canada (Jury Nullification case)
|