The findings of fact that have been accepted by the Ontario Court of
Appeal would provide a standard for factual information about cannabis:
- Consumption of marijuana is relatively harmless compared to the so-called hard
drugs and including tobacco and alcohol;
- There exists no hard evidence demonstrating any irreversible organic or mental
damage from the consumption of marijuana;
- That cannabis does cause alteration of mental functions and as such, it would
not be prudent to drive a car while intoxicated;
- There is no hard evidence that cannabis consumption induces
psychoses;
- Cannabis is not an addictive substance;
- Marijuana is not criminogenic in that there is no evidence of a causal
relationship between cannabis use and criminality;
- That the consumption of marijuana probably does not lead to "hard drug" use for
the vast majority of marijuana consumers, although there appears to be a statistical relationship
between the use of marijuana and a variety of other psychoactive drugs;
- Marijuana does not make people more aggressive or violent;
- There have been no recorded deaths from the consumption of
marijuana;
- There is no evidence that marijuana causes amotivational syndrome;
- Less than 1% of marijuana consumers are daily users;
- Consumption in so-called "de-criminalized states" does not increase out of
proportion to states where there is no de-criminalization.
- Health related costs of cannabis use are negligible when compared to the costs
attributable to tobacco and alcohol consumption.
|